Comments on: Lotus quickr – first look http://www.dagerot.com/2007/09/18/lotus-quickr-first-look/ Joachim Dagerot on development and consulting Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:44:19 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Chris Hamoen http://www.dagerot.com/2007/09/18/lotus-quickr-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-21355 Chris Hamoen Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:01:10 +0000 http://domino.dagerot.com/2007/09/18/lotus-quickr-first-look/#comment-21355 Quickr looks good in marketing materials, but most people are finding that they would prefer to wait for a later release with some challenges sorted out properly. I think you are referencing the troubles with permalinks - that there isn't any such thing. One customer of ours, a big notes shop (5k+ users), took a good run at quickr, but are moving to confluence instead. Quickr looks good in marketing materials, but most people are finding that they would prefer to wait for a later release with some challenges sorted out properly.

I think you are referencing the troubles with permalinks – that there isn’t any such thing. One customer of ours, a big notes shop (5k+ users), took a good run at quickr, but are moving to confluence instead.

]]>